Related Practice Areas


Tom Shirley on Use of Confidential Documents in Discrimination Claims

Employment Law360

 | February 22, 2011

 | Tom Shirley

Tom Shirley wrote “Case Study: Quinlan v. Curtiss-Wright” in Employment Law360, examining a recent decision that taking an employer’s confidential documents can constitute protected activity when the employee uses them in support of a discrimination claim.  While the decision leaves many questions unanswered in terms of practical implications for employers, it emphasizes the need for employers to consult with counsel before making adverse employment decisions and the importance of clear policies regarding employees’ access to and use of confidential information.



Thank you for reaching out to contact Choate. Before you send your message, we wanted to make sure you are aware of the following. Please do not send any confidential information in response to this link. Sending an e-mail to Choate does not give rise to an attorney-client relationship, and will not be deemed to disqualify Choate from undertaking any engagement for a current or future client.  Before any attorney-client engagement may be formed, Choate will need to check for possible conflicts of interest, you will need to consider whether you wish to retain Choate as counsel, and we will need to consider whether we wish to accept the potential engagement. In the meantime, Choate reserves the right to represent parties with interests adverse to you.